lkpvivid.blogg.se

effort on an intense regional search for the missing pilot. At the time the photo was taken, nearly six months after her disappearance, those Western intelligence agencies were cooperating with the U.S. That photo collection was deliberated back-dated to avoid detection in case of interception by a Pacific Islander still loyal to former colonial power Germany or spies working for the Australian or Dutch intelligence services. These debunkers overlook the fact that the disputed photo was never reproduced in book form but was inserted into a photo album produced at the Japanese militarist spy center in Palau, at the colonialist South Sea Agency (Nanyo-cho). The mainstream media involved in denying the validity of a photograph taken of a Amelia Earhart and her navigator Fred Noonan on a dock at Japanese Navy-controlled Jaluit Atoll cite only one bogus claim for “debunking” that telltale evidence: That the photo is a page from a “book” published in “1935”, two years before Earhart’s disappearance. Shimatsu addresses the claim by debunkers putting the 1935 publishing date up as evidence. I still have that interview, and the white papers archived. I did however read all of Yoichi Shimatsu's white papers on this subject, and listened to a two hour interview featuring Sihimatsu. I'll begin by saying that I did not watch the History Channel special, I don't have television. When I'm not building airplanes I'm an amature forensic historian, so I thought it might be fun to look at bit closer at the "debunk". OK, so I'm going to add some data just to keep it interesting.